The next Irish election

I must admit it’s been quite hard to get worked up about who wins the next Irish General election. I could describe myself as being indifferent about whoever wins for the simple reason that I think nothing much is going to change either way due to the similarity of the main political parties and the consensus nature of Irish politics.

On one side you’ve got the ruling coalition of parties: Fianna Fail and the Progressive Democrats. While I tend to respect the PD’s for their libertarian economic policies and their liberal views on social/personnal matters, they along with their coalition partners have probably been in power for far too long than is healthy for the Irish political system. Fianna Fail of course are rotten and corrupt and out of fresh ideas. They are also guilty of unforgivable mismanagement of public works projects like the port tunnel and the Luas public transit system. As far as personalities within the party are concerned, I’ve always found the idea of the current Taoiseach, Bertie Ahern, being ‘a man of the people’ as laughable. Fianna fall backbenchers are much too beholden to special interest groups like the Vintners Association.

The PD leader, Michael MacDowell, is a lightning rod for negative opinion on the ruling coalition’s performance - especially for those critics on the left. I think MacDowell enraging being left is ultimately a good thing. The more angry they become, the more likely they will be to get up off their arses and offer some sort of viable, realistic alternative. Watching the insults fly back and forth between MacDowell and his opponents on the left is of course amusing to no end. They denounce him as a fascist. Playing on the fact that he bears a passing resemblance to Heinrich Himmler. He fights back by taunting the left as a bunch of ’sandal wearing, muesli eaters’. I actually tend to agree with much of what MacDowell states publicly. My main concern is his inability to put his money where his (big) mouth is and deliver on what he claims to stand for.

On the other side: Fine Gael, the Labour Party and the Greens who aren’t much better and do such a miserable job of playing the opposition role, that it raises some hard questions about their suitability for government.

The moderate right wing Fine Gael, is led by the nice-but-useless, Enda Kenny. Actually I take that back - he can’t be all that nice if he isn’t bloody well willing to support his own constituents against a pillaging foreign corporation - as the Shell to Sea controversy in county Mayo has shown.

The left wing Labour party is populated by far too many smug, politically correct, Irish-Times reading, abortion supporting/baby killing, middle-class liberals, like Ivana Batcik, who make me feel like putting my boot through my television screen every time I see her face, even when I actually agree with what she is saying. She can even criticize George Bush and end up make him look like a sympathetic character by the smug, self-righteous tone of her rhetoric. I think elections are often decided by not so much on who you like best, but who you hate the least.

The junior partners in the coalition, the Greens, as always, get my respect for pursuing the worthy cause of protecting our environment. Their economic policies tend to veer towards the nuttier end of the left wing end political spectrum and the traditional opposition towards all forms of nuclear power. I am increasingly beginning to think that nuclear power may be the lesser of a number of vehicles on comps to reducing the overall level of pollution and greenhouse gases emitted.

Economically the two sides are virtually identical (the economic policies of the Greens can be safely ignored) - no political party at this stage is going to tamper with the American-style, Neo-Liberal economic policies which have generated enormous wealth in Ireland during the last two decades. If it ain’t broke don’t fix it as the man said.

I suspect what it may ultimately come down to in choosing between the two coalitions is deciding which one happens to be worse than the other. With Fine Gael threatening this week to drag the Irish political system further down into the gutter by adopting American-style, personalised, negative campaigning tactics, the odds for their side are not looking good. They may well end up shooting themselves in the foot and making their intended targets in Fianna Fail and the PD’s look like victims. Bertie Ahern’s performance in handling the bribes controversy should be a lesson to them. The Teflon Taoiseach and his advisers spun the situation quite well – Ahern’s accomplished performance under the media spotlight made him look like a sympathetic character, while the opposition looked increasingly flustered and toothless as the controversy dragged down. The more they tried to attack Bertie, the more cynical the Irish public became off their motives.

The others:
Sinn Fein may have long since ditched their balaclavas for Armani suits, but they are still radioactive in my book and always will be for their association with terrorism. Their economic policies are well past their sell by date - nothing much aside from the standard Marxist fare.

Socialist workers party - I might not necessarily want them running an economy, but they are sometimes worth a protest vote when I’m fed up with the mainstream parties. They also do great work on issues that most of the mainstream parties tend to ignore - like the Shell to Sea campaign and the anti-war protests.

Independents
Independents are always a great fall-back, even if you don’t necessarily agree with many of their political views.

Socialist independent candidates like Joe Higgins and Tony Gregory have done sterling work over the years and are always worth voting for. They have my utmost respect.

Jackie Healy-Rae - a candidate from my own neck of the woods. He is what Americans might term a ‘redneck’ or a ‘hick’ or what we would call a ‘culchie’. Being someone from outside the Pale myself, it is with great pleasure that I cast a vote his way. The sight of a country bumpkin like him sticking it to the political and media elites in Dublin is just too much of a good opportunity to pass up. For a while the coalition government needed is vote as an independent member of Parliament to give them the numbers to gain a parliament majority. His support wasn’t required during the last election cycle, but it may well be this time round.

On foreign candidates:
During the last round of local elections, I noticed a number of foreigners settled here running for seats. I can think of no better way for immigrants to integrate themselves into Irish society by giving them a stake in the democratic process. In fact, even if you do not agree with their stance on certain issues, I think there is an argument to be made for voting for on them on pragmatic grounds. This might hopefully help facilitate their integration into our society and avoid the immigration debacle other European countries like France and Britain have had.

5 Responses to “The next Irish election”

  1. As you rightly say, there is little to differentiate the available pool of those offering themselves for office.

    I think a smaller, more focussed Cabinet might have resonances with weary voters, who have frankly become indifferent as they enjoy their unaccustomed prosperity.

    Those dedicated to change tend to be at the extremes, largely the Left. They are also the most vocal.

    Much has been made of Waste, yet no party has submitted concrete proposals for a reduction.
    Pat Rabbitte, for all his left-wing rhetoric, is unlikely to propose a sale of the Gulf Stream; the helicopters & the fleet of Mercedes-Benz & Lexus limousines - and use public transport.
    Nor is he likely to advocate a reduction in the bloated Public Service and the removal of uneleted persons, such as the Trade Unions & CORI, who determine inflationary Benchmarking.

    Fine Gael might consider changes - but turkeys, as they say, don’t vote for Christmas - and the perks can be irresistible.

    So where would a voter find a resonance?

    Consider a reduced Cabinet of, say, six Ministers each with an appropriate back-up of professional civil servants.
    Currently, there is extensive overlap of ministerial powers, which is both wasteful, in terms of functional duplication, and provide an easy excuse for evasion of direct responsibility in the frequent breakdowns in communications, often due to overlap.

    Ireland is a small, open economy.
    The population, relative to our geographical land mass is tiny.

    Compare Holland, which has a population co-efficient of four, in a country the size of Munster. And they export agricultural products all over the world; fruit; cheese; flowers; liqueurs; etc… All from a country largely below sea-level.

    Why do we need a Minister for Tourism? Welfare? Defense?

    Consider a Cabinet as follows:-
    Natural Resources;
    Human Recourses;
    Justice & Defense;
    Finance;
    Communications.

    A Principal Minister - and let us find a fresh name - Taoisig have become synonomous with Corruption - might rotate the chair and double as Foreign Affairs.

    (At the moment the two Aherns seem interchangeable - a bit like Tweedledum & Tweedledee - both getting in each other’s way)

    There is talent within the ranks of the FF/PD coalition - and that does not include Bertie.

    McDowell is a competent Minister of Justice; Cowen - with the monkey off his back - could manage Natural Resources; Mary Harney has ability and energy; Brennan also has ability & can be motivated; McCreevy might be tempted to return to Finance.

    These people are likely to be regarded as trustworthy; competent - and as far as any politician can be regarded as truthful - honest.

    I would like to see Liz McManus in such a government line-up.

    Maybe it is asking for a panacea and voters may ask “What about Health?” “What about Transport?” etc…

    But what is Health - or Education - or Commerce - or Agriculture etc? but the development; exploitation; control and growth of Natural & Human Resources?

    A Top Class professionally qualified civil service can deal with the detail.
    The Minister has just got to identify the needs of his Ministry and the Minister of Finance has to find the resources.

    Is this beyond the comprehension of our voters? Is this what would galvanise them into getting out & voting?

    Or are we going to capitulate to the intellectual pygmies and moral degenerates, as Alan Ruddock so memorably described our present leadership?

    Pigs might yet fly!

  2. Jackie is a well rounded hardworking man. He is most certainly not a red neck. He is an open minded , honest, caring person who is not afraid to stand up for what he believes in. He is not a fake an he is a credit to Kerry and to Ireland! Jackie is my hero!

  3. Two new studies show why some people are more attractive for members of the opposite sex than others.

    The University of Florida, Florida State University found that physically attractive people almost instantly attract the attention of the interlocutor, sobesednitsy with them, literally, it is difficult to make eye. This conclusion was reached by a series of psychological experiments, which were determined by the people who believe in sending the first seconds after the acquaintance. Here, a curious feature: single, unmarried experimental preferred to look at the guys, beauty opposite sex, and family, people most often by representatives of their sex.

    The authors believe that this feature developed a behavior as a result of the evolution: a man trying to find a decent pair to acquire offspring. If this is resolved, he wondered potential rivals. Detailed information about this magazine will be published Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

    In turn, a joint study of the Rockefeller University, Rockefeller University and Duke University, Duke University in North Carolina revealed that women are perceived differently by men smell. During experiments studied the perception of women one of the ingredients of male pheromone-androstenona smell, which is contained in urine or sweat.

    The results were startling: women are part of this repugnant odor, and the other part is very attractive, resembling the smell of vanilla, and the third group have not felt any smell. The authors argue that the reason is that the differences in the receptor responsible for the olfactory system, from different people are different.

    It has long been proven that mammals (including human) odor is one way of attracting the attention of representatives of the opposite sex. A detailed article about the journal Nature will publish.

  4. I would like to see a continuation of the topic

  5. 5w4b8age1lslx0uc

Leave a Reply